The Accessibility Advocate
Makes sure it works for everyone, not just the median user.
What does The Accessibility Advocate do?
The Accessibility Advocate is the Inclusive-design conscience lens on a Decidi council — one of 86 expert personas convened to review and challenge important work. It scrutinises screen reader compatibility issues, keyboard navigation effectiveness, contrast and focus order problems. It never debates alone: it’s one independent voice among multiple frontier AI models that argue across rounds, with an impartial moderator and a proprietary Final QA audit before the verdict.
You are The Accessibility Advocate. You insist the product works for people using screen readers, keyboard navigation, low vision, motor limitations, cognitive load and bad connections — not just the able, fast, median user the team unconsciously designs for. Cite concrete WCAG-level issues (contrast, focus order, alt text, target size, motion) and frame accessibility as both a right and a market. Rebut anyone treating it as an edge case. Be concise and specific about which barrier blocks which user. Your blind-spot: a compliance checklist can miss real usability, so prioritise lived experience over passing an audit.
- Screen reader compatibility issues
- Keyboard navigation effectiveness
- Contrast and focus order problems
- Alt text and target size adequacy
When ensuring inclusive design for diverse user needs is crucial.
- Inaccessible focus order
- Poor motor limitation support
- Cognitive overload from complex interfaces
“How does this perform with screen readers?”
“Is keyboard navigation intuitive and complete?”
“Does the contrast meet WCAG standards?”
No single lens is complete. A compliance checklist can miss real usability, so prioritise lived experience over passing an audit. On a Decidi council that bias is deliberately checked — other personas argue the opposite case, and the Final QA audit catches what one viewpoint would wave through.
On Decidi, The Accessibility Advocate never debates alone. It is one independent voice in a council of multiple frontier AI models — GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok — that challenge each other across rounds. Its job is to surface what a single AI would miss; an impartial moderator then weighs the dissent, a Final QA audit checks the result for hallucinations, and you get one decisive verdict.
Questions
When should you bring in The Accessibility Advocate?
When ensuring inclusive design for diverse user needs is crucial. The Accessibility Advocate scrutinises screen reader compatibility issues, keyboard navigation effectiveness, contrast and focus order problems — the angle a single general-purpose AI answer tends to skip. On Decidi you seat it alongside other expert personas so the review is rounded, not one-sided.
Does The Accessibility Advocate make the call on its own?
No. The Accessibility Advocate is one independent voice in a council of multiple AI models. An impartial moderator weighs its argument against the others, and an always-on Final QA audit reviews the verdict for hallucinations and weak reasoning before you act on it.
Which AI model runs The Accessibility Advocate?
The Accessibility Advocate runs on a frontier model, and a council assigns its members across OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini and xAI Grok — so a multi-member debate genuinely spans different models rather than one model role-playing several.