Skip to content
AI Risk Library · Workflow & productivity
The AI risk library

Workflow & productivity: 20 ways AI gets it wrong

Forgotten constraints, self-contradiction and 'almost right' deliverables. Each failure mode below is phrased as the question people actually ask, with what it looks like in real work — and the layer of the Trust Stack that catches it.

Agreement alone is not proof

Does AI guess instead of asking for what it's missing?

A deliverable is produced on a guessed value instead of asking for the real one.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Why does AI ask questions it could have answered itself?

It stalls with clarifying questions when it had enough to proceed.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Can AI overcomplicate a simple task?

A one-line answer is turned into a multi-step process no one needed.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Does AI oversimplify a complex task?

A genuinely hard problem is reduced to a checklist that ignores the hard parts.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Why does AI lose track of earlier instructions?

A constraint given at the start is quietly dropped by the end.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Can AI forget the constraints it was given?

The output violates a rule that was clearly stated up front.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Does AI contradict itself across responses?

Today's answer flatly disagrees with what it said earlier.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Why is AI formatting inconsistent?

Headings, lists, and styles change shape from one section to the next.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Can AI ignore the format it was asked for?

A table was requested and prose was delivered instead.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Does AI ignore word and length limits?

A 200-word brief comes back at 800 words.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Why does AI add sections nobody asked for?

Extra headings appear that the brief never requested.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Can AI drop sections that mattered?

A required section is missing from the final output.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Does AI fail to prioritize what matters most?

Everything is presented at the same weight with no sense of what's critical.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Why doesn't AI explain the trade-offs?

An option is recommended with no mention of what you give up to choose it.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Can AI fail to produce something actually usable?

The output looks complete but can't be used without rebuilding it.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Does AI create busywork instead of progress?

The work generates more tasks to manage than value it delivers.

Caught by the Risk Reviewer

Why does AI force the user to check everything by hand?

Nothing can be trusted, so every line has to be re-verified manually.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Can AI produce "almost right" work that still needs heavy editing?

The draft is 80% there but the remaining 20% takes longer than starting over.

Caught by the Final QA audit

Does AI reliably judge the quality of its own work?

It pronounces a flawed answer "complete and correct."

Caught by the Devil's Advocate

Why does AI give a polished answer before actually thinking?

A confident, well-formatted reply arrives before the real reasoning was done.

Caught by the Devil's Advocate

One model can’t reliably catch its own mistakes. A council of independent minds can.

Run your work through the council

All 250 failure modes · See also: the Trust Stack