AI grant proposal review
See your proposal the way the review panel will — before you submit.
What is AI grant proposal review?
AI grant proposal review uses multiple AI models and a reviewer-minded panel to read your proposal the way a funding committee will: against the funder's stated priorities and scoring criteria, testing the significance and impact case, the methodology and feasibility, the budget justification and the measurable outcomes. Decidi surfaces the weak points a real reviewer will mark down, ranks them by how much each costs you on the scorecard, and audits the findings before you submit. It strengthens your case — it does not write the proposal for you or guarantee an award.
Who it’s for
- Researchers & academics submitting to funding bodies
- Nonprofits & NGOs writing funder and foundation applications
- Grant writers and development teams polishing a submission before deadline
What goes wrong without a review
- A proposal that reads well to you but misses the funder's actual scoring criteria
- A vague significance and impact case that reviewers can't score highly
- Methodology, timeline or budget gaps a panel will flag as unfeasible
- Jargon and assumed context that lose a non-specialist reviewer
- A single AI polishing the prose while missing what would get it rejected
How Decidi reviews it
Decidi seats a reviewer-minded council — a strategy consultant, a Devil's Advocate, a data-skeptic, a pre-mortem analyst and a positioning/comms persona — each on a different model. They read the proposal against the funder's criteria, debate where it would lose points, and the moderator returns a ranked list of what to fix, with the specific revision for each. The Final QA audit checks for over-claimed impact and missed criteria before it's finalised.
Recommended council
What the council surfaces
- Where the proposal does and doesn't match the funder's stated criteria
- The weak points a reviewer will score down, ranked by impact on the score
- A sharper, more defensible significance and impact case
- Methodology, timeline and budget gaps to close before submission
- The specific revision to make for each issue
Review checklist
Questions
Will it write my grant proposal for me?
It is built to review and strengthen a draft, not to ghost-write a submission. Bring your proposal and the funder's call, and the council shows you where it would lose points and exactly what to revise — so the work and the ideas stay yours.
Can it review against a specific funder's criteria?
Yes — paste or attach the funding call, scoring rubric or guidelines alongside your draft, and the council reads the proposal against those criteria specifically, flagging where it falls short of what the panel is told to reward.
What kinds of proposals can it review?
Research grants, foundation and trust applications, government and council funding, fellowship and scholarship applications, and nonprofit programme funding. Attach the draft and the call, and the council reads both in full.
Run this review now
Hand the council your work and get a verdict you can act on — audited before you commit, saved and downloadable.
Start free