Decidi for lawyers
Find the hole in your argument before opposing counsel does.
Pressure-test the argument before it reaches a judge — every cited case verified as real, the strongest counter-argument surfaced, and the weakest link named while you can still fix it.
- Catch hallucinated or fabricated case citations before they ever reach a filing — independent models cross-check every authority instead of one model inventing a plausible-looking cite.
- Have a "worst judge" tear the argument apart so the bench can’t surprise you with a question you never considered.
- Get the strongest version of opposing counsel’s best move, then a defending-counsel rebuttal — both sides argued before you walk into the room.
- Surface missed precedent, distinguishable facts and the line of cases that cuts against you.
- Audit the contract for the clause that bites in twelve months — ambiguity, missing carve-outs, one-sided indemnities.
- Sanity-check exposure and liability so nothing goes out under your name that you haven’t stress-tested first.
- The legal argument — premises, logical chain, and the inference a hostile judge would reject
- Every case citation — does the authority exist, say what you claim, and still stand?
- Contract clauses — ambiguity, missing definitions, indemnity and termination traps
- Liability and exposure — the downside scenario you’d rather not write down
- Opposing counsel’s strongest move — argued at full strength, not a strawman
- Missed precedent and distinguishable facts that change the outcome
Say you are filing heads of argument in a contractual dispute on Friday. Your chain of reasoning leans on three authorities, one of which a junior found late last night, and opposing counsel is known for finding the case you missed.
You paste the argument and the citations. The council’s first pass is independent: each member on a different frontier model verifies that every authority exists, says what you claim, and has not been distinguished or overturned — the cross-check that catches both hallucinated cites and the real case read too optimistically. Then the Devil’s Advocate argues the other side’s best version, the Steelman strengthens it further, and the Defending Counsel rebuts — so the weakest inference in your chain is named while you can still re-draft. The verdict ranks what to fix by how a hostile judge would exploit it, and the Final QA audit lists every point you must verify against the record before filing.
Chat free · no sign-up, no card