Skip to content
Briefs · marketingUpdated

Ad Campaign Critique

Get an ad campaign torn apart before you spend the budget.

You walk away with

A critique with the strongest angle, the fix list and what to test.

Decidi convenes

Ad money is spent on hunches dressed as strategy, so each seat attacks a different hunch: the Performance Marketer audits the media plan against the objective, David Ogilvy judges whether the ad makes a real promise or just decorates, and the Copywriter with the Conversion Strategist follows the click all the way to the landing page — where most campaigns actually die. The Customer Psychologist tests whether the message lands with the person seeing it, and the Data Skeptic asks how you will even know if it worked.

Recommended level: StandardProven pro models — the everyday default.
What the council debates
Critique this ad campaign before we put money behind it.

THE CAMPAIGN:
[the creative, copy, channel, audience and offer — paste or describe]
OBJECTIVE: [awareness / leads / sales — and the target metric]
BUDGET & CHANNEL: [where it runs and how much]

Debate:
1. The hook — does it stop the scroll in the first second.
2. The angle — is the message a real, differentiated reason to act, or generic.
3. Audience-message fit — does this land with the people seeing it.
4. The offer and the call to action — is the next step clear and worth taking.
5. The funnel after the click — does the landing experience match the promise.
6. Whether the budget and channel suit the objective.

FINAL SYNTHESIS:
- The strongest angle to lead with, and why.
- A prioritised fix list for creative, copy and targeting.
- Two or three variations worth testing first, and the metric that decides the winner.
What the debate sounds like

An illustrative excerpt for a hypothetical brief of this type: A DTC skincare brand is about to put $15,000 behind a video campaign whose hook is the founder’s lab background, targeting broad 25–45 on two social platforms with the goal of “brand awareness and sales”. Every real run is generated fresh from your specifics, debated across rounds, and audited before the verdict.

🎩
David Ogilvy

The advertisement has no promise. A founder in a lab coat is a credential, not a benefit — nobody ever bought a face cream because the chemist looked serious. What does the product do for her skin that she can see in the mirror? Lead with that, prove it with the lab coat second. Credentials support promises; they do not replace them.

🎯
The Performance Marketer

“Awareness and sales” is two campaigns wearing one budget, and $15,000 is not enough to do both. Awareness buys reach you cannot measure at this spend; sales needs conversion-optimised delivery and a tight audience. Pick sales, narrow 25–45 to the segment the product actually serves, and let the platform optimise against purchases, not views.

🫀
The Customer Psychologist

The lab-credibility angle is not worthless — it answers a real anxiety, “is this brand safe or snake oil?” — but that is a mid-funnel objection, not a scroll-stopper. The stopping moment for skincare is recognition: her specific problem named in the first second. Lead with the problem she has, answer the trust question one beat later.

🔬
The Data Skeptic

Before a euro moves: the measurement plan is “platform dashboard says sales”. Both platforms will claim the same conversions, and you will report success twice. Define the holdout or at minimum compare blended revenue against spend weekly. Decide now what number kills the campaign at day fourteen — deciding after seeing the data is how losing campaigns run for months.

Run this brief as a council

Prefer drop-and-go? Use the Ad Campaign Critique tool — team pre-seated, included with Plus.

Questions people ask

What materials does the council need to critique a campaign?

The creative (paste the script, copy or attach frames), the audience and channel plan, the offer, the budget and the objective — plus the landing page the click hits, because the critique follows the whole chain. Campaigns mostly fail after the click, and a creative-only review misses that.

Can it critique the campaign before I’ve made the creative?

Yes — run it at the angle stage. The synthesis names the strongest angle to lead with and two or three variations worth testing, which is cheaper than discovering the angle problem after production. Teams often run this brief twice: once on the concept, once on the finished creative.

Will it tell me where the budget should actually go?

It will tell you whether the budget matches the objective — the most common finding is a budget split across goals or channels that undermines both — and what to test first at your spend level. What it will not do is invent performance predictions; the deliverable includes the metric that decides the winner in the real data.