AI code review
Catch the bug and the security hole before it ships.
What is AI code review?
AI code review uses multiple AI models and personas — a software architect, a security engineer and a Devil’s Advocate — to review code for correctness, edge cases, security vulnerabilities, error handling, performance and maintainability, returning a severity-ranked findings list (P0 exploitable → P3 nit) with the concrete fix for each. Decidi audits the findings before you act.
Who it’s for
- Engineers reviewing a change before merge
- Solo founders shipping without a second reviewer
- Teams hardening code before a public launch
What goes wrong without a review
- A security hole (injection, authz, unsafe deserialization) one model misses
- Edge cases and race conditions that only surface in production
- Error handling that swallows failures silently
- A single model approving code it doesn’t fully understand
How Decidi reviews it
Decidi convenes a software-architect persona, a security engineer, a Devil’s Advocate and a pragmatist, each on a different model. They review the code from different angles, debate the real risks, and the moderator returns a severity-ranked list with the fix for each — plus what’s well-built. Final QA checks for false positives and missed exploit paths.
Recommended council
What the council surfaces
- Severity-ranked findings (P0 exploitable → P3 nit)
- The specific fix or patch for each
- Security, correctness, performance and maintainability
- What’s well-built and should be left alone
Review checklist
Questions
What languages can it review?
Paste the code or files in any mainstream language. The council reviews logic, security and structure regardless of stack.
Does it replace tests or a security audit?
No — it catches a lot before merge, but it complements (not replaces) your test suite and a formal security audit for high-risk systems.
Run this review now
Hand the council your work and get a verdict you can act on — audited before you commit, saved and downloadable.
Start free