Is this contract safe to sign?
Decidi answers “is this contract safe to sign?” by having a legal-aware council of independent AI models read the agreement in full: a contracts reviewer, a corporate-lawyer persona, a Devil’s Advocate and a pragmatist, each on a different frontier model. They debate which clauses actually bite — liability, termination, auto-renewal, IP, quietly one-sided wording — and the moderator returns a plain-English verdict: the red flags ranked by how much each could cost you, the specific redline to ask for, and what to fight for versus accept. The Final QA audit then checks the verdict, flags shown, never hidden. It is not a substitute for a qualified lawyer where one is genuinely needed — and it tells you when that is.
Who faces this call
- Founders and operators signing vendor, SaaS and partnership agreements
- Freelancers and agencies handed a client’s standard contract
- Employees reading an offer, restraint or severance agreement
- Anyone facing a contract they didn’t draft, written to favour the side that did
What the council does, round by round
- 1
Opening positions
Each member reads the full agreement you paste or attach and stakes a position on whether it is safe to sign as-is — naming the exact clauses that decide it, not summarising the document.
- 2
Rebuttals & cross-examination
The members challenge each other by name: the contracts reviewer’s red flags are tested against the pragmatist’s view of what is standard and survivable, and the Devil’s Advocate argues the worst realistic case for each clause when the relationship sours.
- 3
Moderator synthesis
The impartial chair turns the debate into a plain-English contract review: exactly what you are committing to, the red flags ranked by how much each could cost you, the specific redline to request for each, and a “what I’d fight for vs accept” summary.
- 4
Final QA & sign-off
The Final QA audit checks the review for missed exceptions, misread clauses and overconfident claims, and itemises what you must verify against the actual document — flags shown, never hidden. Where a clause genuinely needs a jurisdiction-specific lawyer, the verdict says so, specifically.
- 5
Council roll call
You see where each member finally stood on signing — agree, concern or dissent — so you know whether “sign it” carried the room or scraped through.
What you get back
The shape of the verdict — illustrative structure, not a sample result. The content of each part comes from your brief and the council’s actual debate.
Exactly what you are agreeing to do, pay and give up — translated from the legalese.
Each risky clause with what it means in practice and how much it could cost you if things go wrong.
The specific wording change to request for each red flag — ready to send back.
A clear split of what is worth negotiating and what is standard enough to live with.
Where a member disagreed with the overall read — preserved, not smoothed over.
The clause references to confirm against the actual document, and where a qualified lawyer is genuinely warranted.
Recommended council
Each seat runs on a different frontier model — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok — so the debate is a genuine cross-model argument, not one mind in five costumes. Swap any seat from Decidi’s 86 personas.
Questions
Is this legal advice?
No. It helps you understand an agreement and spot red flags fast — in plain English, ranked by cost — but it is not legal advice. Where a clause genuinely requires a licensed, jurisdiction-specific lawyer, the verdict says so specifically rather than burying it in boilerplate.
What kinds of contracts can it review?
Paste or upload the agreement — NDA, SaaS, vendor, employment, freelance, partnership, lease. The council reads it in full and debates the clauses that matter when things go wrong: liability, indemnity, termination, auto-renewal, IP, exclusivity and payment terms.
Why is a council better than one AI summarising the contract?
A single model confidently summarises — and can miss the load-bearing clause. Decidi’s members sit on different frontier models and argue with each other, so one member’s miss is another’s catch, and the Final QA audit checks the verdict against the document before you see it.
Do I get something I can send back to the other side?
Yes — the verdict includes the specific redline to request for each red flag, plus a “fight for vs accept” summary, so you reply with concrete asks instead of vague concerns.
Make the call with a council behind you
Is this contract safe to sign? Put it to the council and get a decisive, audited verdict — saved and downloadable.
Start free