What should we charge?
Decidi answers “what should we charge?” with a defended pricing recommendation, not a plausible round number. A council of independent AI models — a pricing strategist, a CFO, a behavioural economist, an enterprise buyer and a Devil’s Advocate, each on a different frontier model — debates your value metric, model, tiers and price points, with every figure reasoned or explicitly labelled an assumption to verify against real willingness-to-pay. The moderator returns a recommended structure with the rationale for each line, the psychological framing, the migration plan and the pricing risks to watch. The Final QA audit checks the numbers before you act — flags shown, never hidden.
Who faces this call
- Founders pricing a first product with nothing to anchor on
- SaaS teams re-cutting tiers and afraid of breaking existing revenue
- Freelancers and agencies setting rates they suspect are too low
- Anyone about to pick a price because it “feels right” at the end of a long day
What the council does, round by round
- 1
Opening positions
Each member stakes a pricing position from your brief — the product, customers and costs you describe: the pricing strategist proposes a value metric and structure, the CFO tests it against the cost floor, the enterprise buyer reacts as the person who’d actually pay.
- 2
Rebuttals & cross-examination
The positions collide: the behavioural economist challenges the anchoring and tier framing, the Devil’s Advocate attacks the willingness-to-pay assumptions, and every figure must carry its reasoning — the integrity rules ban bare invented numbers and false precision.
- 3
Moderator synthesis
The impartial chair delivers the pricing call: a recommended structure — tiers, price points and what gates each — with the reasoning for every line, the psychological framing (anchor, decoy, best-value tier), the expansion path and the migration plan for existing customers.
- 4
Final QA & sign-off
The Final QA audit re-derives the numbers, checks each figure is either reasoned or labelled an assumption, and itemises exactly what to validate against real customers and competitors before rollout — flags shown, never hidden.
- 5
Council roll call
You see where each member landed on the recommended structure — agree, concern or dissent — so a contested price point never arrives looking settled.
What you get back
The shape of the verdict — illustrative structure, not a sample result. The content of each part comes from your brief and the council’s actual debate.
The tiers, price points and what gates each — as a clean comparison, with reasoning per line.
What the customer pays more for as they get more value — the spine of the whole model.
Anchor, decoy and “best value” placement, and why the structure reads the way it does.
How existing customers move over, and how revenue grows as customers grow.
Where a member priced it differently and why — preserved alongside the recommendation.
The willingness-to-pay, competitor-price and cost assumptions to validate with real data first.
Recommended council
Each seat runs on a different frontier model — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok — so the debate is a genuine cross-model argument, not one mind in five costumes. Swap any seat from Decidi’s 86 personas.
Questions
Will it just make up market numbers?
No — that is exactly what the integrity rules forbid. Every figure in the verdict is either reasoned from what you provided or explicitly labelled an assumption with its basis, and the Final QA audit strips anything unverifiable and puts it on your “verify before you rely on this” list instead.
Can it price my kind of product?
The council designs pricing for SaaS tiers, one-off products, services and rates, usage-based models and hybrids. Describe the product, who buys it and your costs; attach anything useful. The structure it returns is built for your situation, not a template.
Why is this better than asking one AI for a price?
One model hands you one plausible number with no resistance. Decidi makes a pricing strategist defend the structure against a CFO’s cost floor, a buyer’s procurement instincts and a behavioural economist’s framing critique — on different frontier models — before a separate audit checks the arithmetic.
What about my existing customers?
The verdict includes a migration plan — how current customers move to the new structure without churning — plus the one or two pricing risks most worth watching after rollout.
Make the call with a council behind you
What should we charge? Put it to the council and get a decisive, audited verdict — saved and downloadable.
Start free