Should we launch?
Decidi answers “should we launch?” by convening a council of independent frontier AI models — GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok — each seated as a different expert. They debate your launch across structured rounds: the case for launching now, the case for waiting, the cost of delay and the risks either way. An impartial moderator turns the debate into one decisive recommendation — launch or wait, with a confidence level and what would change the call — and Decidi’s always-on Final QA audit checks it before you act, flags shown, never hidden.
Who faces this call
- Founders staring at a launch date with no impartial person to ask
- Product teams whose product is “nearly ready” — and has been for a month
- Marketers holding a campaign or announcement, unsure the moment is right
- Solo makers who know one more chat with one AI will just agree with them
What the council does, round by round
- 1
Opening positions
Each council member — a different expert persona on a different frontier model — reads your brief and stakes a clear position: launch now or wait, grounded in the specifics you gave, with its load-bearing assumption named and anything critical the brief is missing called out.
- 2
Rebuttals & cross-examination
The members answer each other by name: the growth case for momentum is tested against the pre-mortem’s ways this launch fails, the risk officer prices the downside, and the Devil’s Advocate steelmans whichever side is weakest. Deeper runs add refinement and final-challenge rounds.
- 3
Moderator synthesis
An impartial chair who took no side turns the debate into the decision: a clear launch-or-wait recommendation with a confidence level, the criteria that decided it, the strongest dissenting view — and why the call still lands where it does.
- 4
Final QA & sign-off
Decidi’s proprietary Final QA audit — a separate model that took no part in the debate — checks the verdict for unsupported claims, overconfidence and missed caveats, then hands you the clean deliverable plus a “verify before you rely on this” list. Flags are shown, never hidden.
- 5
Council roll call
You see where every member finally stood — agree, concern or dissent — read honestly from what each actually argued, so a 3–2 call never masquerades as unanimous.
What you get back
The shape of the verdict — illustrative structure, not a sample result. The content of each part comes from your brief and the council’s actual debate.
Launch or wait, stated plainly up front, with a confidence level — never a survey of considerations.
The criteria that actually mattered for your situation and how the options scored against them.
What launching now (or waiting) exposes you to, ranked by likelihood × damage, each with a mitigation.
The strongest case for the other side, preserved — and why the chair still lands on the call.
The specific evidence or event that should flip the decision, plus concrete next steps.
Every assumption and figure the decision rests on that you must confirm against reality first.
Recommended council
Each seat runs on a different frontier model — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok — so the debate is a genuine cross-model argument, not one mind in five costumes. Swap any seat from Decidi’s 86 personas.
Questions
How does the council actually decide launch vs wait?
Independent members on different frontier models (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok) argue both sides across structured rounds. An impartial moderator then weighs the debate and commits to one recommendation with a confidence level — the house rules forbid fence-sitting, so you always get a call, not a list of considerations.
What if the council disagrees?
Disagreement is the point — and it is never smoothed over. The verdict preserves the strongest dissenting view, and the council roll call shows where every member finally stood: agree, concern or dissent, read honestly from what each actually argued.
What do I need to provide?
A few honest sentences: what you are launching, its current state, who it is for and what is making you hesitate. You can attach documents — a readiness checklist, a plan, metrics — and the council reads them. The more specific the brief, the more load-bearing the verdict.
Is the verdict checked before I get it?
Yes. Every Decidi verdict passes a Final QA audit — a separate model that took no part in the debate hunts for unsupported claims, overconfidence and missed caveats, and gives you an itemised “verify before you rely on this” list. Flags are shown, never hidden.
Make the call with a council behind you
Should we launch? Put it to the council and get a decisive, audited verdict — saved and downloadable.
Start free