AI Landing Page Review
Drop your landing page in. Four rival AIs audit it for conversion — message, friction, trust — and hand back the changes that move signups.
A prioritised set of conversion fixes with rewritten copy where it counts.
Signed off by an independent Final QA audit — with a “verify before you rely on this” list, never a black box.
Why this team
Conversion problems hide in the gap between what a page says and what a visitor hears in five seconds. The Conversion Strategist owns the funnel mechanics, the Copywriter interrogates every headline word, and the Performance Marketer checks the page against the traffic actually arriving on it — the mismatch nobody audits. The Visual Designer traces where the eye really goes, the End-User Advocate reads it cold, and the Data Skeptic stops the room fixing things the numbers say are not broken.
Each seat runs on a different frontier model — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok — so it’s a genuine cross-model review, not one AI in costumes. How a run works →
What the debate sounds like
An illustrative excerpt — A bookkeeping SaaS spends $4,000 a month on ads promising “done-for-you bookkeeping”, landing on a page whose hero reads “Financial clarity for modern businesses” — and converts under one percent of visitors.
This is a scent-trail break, not a page problem in isolation. The ad promises done-for-you; the hero answers with an abstraction. A visitor who clicked “we do your books” must see those words — or their synonym — within one second of landing, or the ad budget is buying bounces.
“Financial clarity for modern businesses” could headline a bank, an ERP or a crypto fund — it excludes no one and therefore convinces no one. The rewrite is on the wall: “Your books, done for you, by Thursday.” Specific promise, specific time, and it matches the ad that paid for the click.
Before anyone claims a diagnosis: under one percent of how many visitors, converting to what? If that is sixteen sign-ups from two thousand visits, the sample is too small to attribute a cause. Fix the obvious scent break because it is obvious — but instrument the form drop-off before declaring victory.
Questions
Do I paste the URL or a screenshot — and does traffic context matter?
Either works; a screenshot plus the copy is most reliable. Include where visitors come from and what the ad or link promised — the sharpest finding in most audits is the mismatch between traffic intent and page message, which is invisible if you only look at the page.
Will I get rewritten copy or just critique?
Both — the synthesis includes a rewritten hero (headline, subhead, CTA) plus the prioritised fix list with the specific change for each item, ordered by expected conversion impact. The rewrite is a starting point argued into shape by the copy and conversion seats, not a final draft.
My conversion rate is fine — is there any point running this?
Run it before you scale spend, not after. A page that converts acceptably at low spend often leaks badly at ten times the budget, because colder audiences hit it. The audit names what only works because your current traffic is warm — the fragility you cannot see from inside a working funnel.
Your material is used only to run your review — never to train public models. Encrypted in transit and at rest. Security & privacy →
Want full control — pick your own minds, set the depth? Open the full council →